Proposed logistics park on Lantau: LegCo
Question to be asked 1 June 2005 in LegCo: *7. Hon Martin LEE to ask: (Translation) Regarding the plan to construct a logistics park at Siu Ho Wan on Lantau Island, will the Government inform this Council: (a) whether, before formulating the above plan, it has comprehensively studied the market demand for and the economic benefits of the logistics park, to prove that there is an actual need for an additional logistics park in Hong Kong; if it has, of the study results; if not, the reasons for that; (b) whether it has examined the feasibility of alternative sites for the logistics park in accordance with the requirements under the technical guidelines for the environmental impact assessment issued by the Environmental Protection Department; if it has, of the sites involved, and the reasons for not including them in the scope of the current engineering feasibility study; if not, the reasons for that; and (c) given that the logistics park will involve large-scale reclamation works, whether the authorities have consulted the public on the reclamation and other issues, such as the demand and possible sites for the logistics park, etc; if not, the reasons for that? Public Officer to reply : Secretary for Economic Development and Labour
Thanks again for posting, Tom.
Looks like the Lantau projects may start to come under spotlight at last.
Expect plenty of Yes Minister type blather in response. (After all, this "park" was in Concept Plan - which has been discussed, hasn't it? [Hands up all Hongkongers who know even vaguely what's in the plan])
Thanks again, Tom.
Seems to me the questions weren't really answered: no clear "yes" to whether economic need proven.
Interesting that, "the EIA study report will present the reasons for locating the LLP at Siu Ho Wan."
- this seems wonderfully obedient of authors of EIA study report; when I'd thought EIA studies were about assessing likely environmental impacts of projects, and considering alternatives.
Also, the 3-month consultation exercise for Concept Plan seems to mean the public has indeed been consulted re the project. (It would be interesting to survey Hong Kong people, see how many know of this and other projects for Lantau.)
Seems a case of some powerful interests want this; and the environment (and the public at large) be damned.






















I'm looking for the official response to last week's question by Lee Wing-tat on the Lantau North Country Park.
Something tells me that if you check the responses for this question and the one on the Country Park extension, it should become clear that the Lantau Development Concept Plan (and non-Concept Plan auxillaries like Cheung Sha Spa and Container Port #10) are a windfall giveaway to land developers who don't live or don't have friends who live in the spaces to be affected by these projects.